Documented guidance to help you use the platform confidently.
Path: Monitoring and Discovery > Review Inbox and Evidence. This page is the main quality gate. Do not use results for reputation, narratives, or plans until the evidence has been reviewed and an appropriate decision recorded. Figure 5: Review Inbox,
Read article ←State | When to use it Waiting for review | New content requiring a human decision. Accepted | Relevant to the institution and eligible for analysis and metrics, subject to sample requirements. Rejected | Incorrect or unhelpful content, with a record
Read article ←1. Open the Waiting for Review tab and use search or the source filter if needed. 2. Read the full content, provenance, publication date, and source name. 3. Open the original post when a link is available and check its context. 4. Review the match,
Read article ←You can select several records and choose an action for the selection. Use this only after reviewing every record in the group. Bulk acceptance may require you to confirm relevance for records without a clear match; marking duplicates requires identi
Read article ←